Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 VISION D  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 03:27
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$279
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 310
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 1,234
108% 922 Pts
64-Core 2,130
132% 2,130 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 114
Parallax 103
90% 109 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 105
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2208 2151 1179 1177 1188 1178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,503
Write 2,376
Mixed 1,664
SusWrite 1,513
452% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 81.6
267% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 1,196
892% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 328%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
147GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 300 300 301 301 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 486
Mixed 416
SusWrite 320
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 55
185% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 489
Mixed 402
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 56
188% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
12GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 110 120 119 113 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 146
Write 140
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 118
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 214 214 217 215 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
10GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.7 3.6 4.7 4.7 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.1
7% 6.08 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 VISION D Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,548
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback