Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Memory 30 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 40.2 19% 29.9 Pts	4-Core 42.5 8-Core 41.6 6% 42 Pts	64-Core 35.5 2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1012) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4004RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 123 132 132 119 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 369 Write 328 Mixed 152 SusWrite 139 55% 247 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 21.1 4K Mixed 12.4 48% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 101 DQ Write 78.4 DQ Mixed 13.2 31% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 3 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 5.6 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 255 16% 255 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	119x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	98x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	62x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	353x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 5,526 samples	86x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	62x
1x4GBD3L16S28MP-4G-ACERBench 22%, 818 samples	56x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16