Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 29.7 1-Core 22 2-Core 44.7 20% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 79.7 8-Core 78.6 11% 79.1 Pts	64-Core 88.2 6% 88.2 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 2B18) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.52% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 3 Parallax 2.4 1% 2.33 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.52% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT23H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 274 315 318 319 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 416 Write 401 Mixed 356 SusWrite 311 84% 371 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 29.5 84% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 164 DQ Mixed 172 129% 172 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4.8 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 256 16% 256 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	9x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	9x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	2x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	1x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	1x

Value: 16% - Very poor

Total price: $89

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16