HP 550-233ng

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-233ng  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '17 at 15:50
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8750 Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 126
54% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics + R5 Dual Graphics
HP(103C 2B53) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Lighting 9.33
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 12.6
8% 10.1 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 8.83
7% 8.36 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 480
Write 129
Mixed 200
59% 270 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 6.91
53% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.8
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 6.95
11% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback