ECT FB 24017 ONE GAMING Premium IN06

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	ECT FB 24017 ONE GAMING Premium IN06 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '20 at 21:22
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 159 2-Core 319 103% 191 Pts	4-Core 627 8-Core 987 99% 807 Pts	64-Core 1,348 83% 1,348 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 861E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.5% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 135 Parallax 125 97% 126 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 129 Splatting 113 93% 113 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 124 129 126 126 126 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 464 Write 168 Mixed 149 SusWrite 132 50% 228 MB/s	4K Read 18 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 7 70% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 28.6 65% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 86%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 489GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 473 343 249 249 245 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 341 Mixed 371 SusWrite 340 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 42.8 158% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 326 245% 327 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 98%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.8 5.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 3.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 5.5 9% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 11.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 42% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB 22,335 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2472 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 27.1 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 27.7 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FB 24017 ONE GAMING Premium IN06 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: ECT FB 24017 ONE GAMING Premium IN06

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	1x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	1x

RAM
9905625-097.A00G 9905598-044.A00G 32GBKingstonBench 81%, 1 sample	1x
BL16G32C16U4R.16FE 2x16GBCrucialBench 100%, 467 samples	1x
9905678-138.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 404 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16