Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 21:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 549
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 630
39% 630 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
MSI(1462 C728) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 171
Parallax 176
144% 174 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 158
Splatting 131
130% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,527
Write 1,336
Mixed 581
254% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 58.5
206% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 57.8
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 73.1
79% 125 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
31GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 138 126 117 136 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
288% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 111%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
15GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 134 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 127
Mixed 74
SusWrite 134
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.3
270% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.6
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback