Biostar TZ77B

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	94.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar TZ77B (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '20 at 04:22
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	99%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 376 44% 343 Pts	64-Core 374 23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.3% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 114 Parallax 136 94% 122 fps	MRender 155 Gravity 111 Splatting 95 96% 120 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 125 112 108 81 83 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.3% Average	Read 240 Write 175 Mixed 139 SusWrite 109 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 17.4 65% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 72 65% 102 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 76%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB 29,096 User benchmarks, average bench 203% 24GB free Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 792 Write 559 Mixed 538 139% 630 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 98.3 4K Mixed 27.3 111% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 98.4 DQ Write 623 DQ Mixed 779 477% 500 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
SSK 500GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 115GB free Firmware: 0208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 420 423 428 431 431 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 17GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,776 Write 4,603 Mixed 4,649 1,045% 4,676 MB/s	4K Read 286 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 213 802% 227 MB/s	DQ Read 1,062 DQ Write 890 DQ Mixed 969 728% 974 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
FV-U35 1TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2GB free, PID ce12 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 34.8 Write 38 Mixed 28.8 44% 33.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%
DMI External HDD 1TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2GB free, PID 0336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.7 8.6 7.8 7.8 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 26 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 8.2 29% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 6GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.8 9.9 9.3 9.2 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 35 Write 37 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 9.5 38% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 19%
WD My Passport 071A 250GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 4GB free, PID 071a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 35 Write 33 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 10.9 34% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 18%
Generic Storage Device 256GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 1336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.6 6.8 8.3 8.2 8.4 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 19.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 7.9 22% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.9 188% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 17%
Generic MassStorageClass 537GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 488GB free, PID 4567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 9.7 3 9.2 2.3 8.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	4.1% Terrible	Read 13.2 Write 2 Mixed 3 SusWrite 5.9 7% 6.03 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 18% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.1% Great: 10%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 16 17 18 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 16.7 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 14.9 30% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 3.5 230% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 45%
Mass Storage Device 128GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 4GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 16 13 15 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 19.2 Write 18.2 Mixed 18 SusWrite 13.7 23% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.2 225% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB 20,216 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.2 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TZ77B Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TZ77B

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	22x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x
Core i5-3550Intel $335Bench 69%, 23,599 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	6x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	5x
Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 16,472 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $304

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16