Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G41MT-ES2L (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100528
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$150 18,432 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Memory 47.9 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 75.9 33% 53.8 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 144 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 11,020 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8326) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.55% Terrible	Lighting 6.13 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 2.47 5% 5.02 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.55% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 195 194 204 204 204 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 220 Write 194 Mixed 196 SusWrite 194 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 32.9 110% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.9 DQ Write 71.7 DQ Mixed 50.9 40% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 100GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 79 78 79 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 82.5 Write 64.1 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 78.2 50% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 70%
CBM2080 Flash Disk 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 0GB free, PID null, SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 7.4 7.2 7.9 7 7.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.62% Terrible	Read 4.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 7.5 8% 5.27 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 8% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.62% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	21x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	16x
Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples	12x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	27x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

SSD
SSD 120GBGigabyte $31Bench 70%, 13,685 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	3x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $140

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16