Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H57M-USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 22 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 193
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 249
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 8525) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.87
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 9.22
7% 8.64 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.09
7% 8.41 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 157 163 179 190 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 238
Write 226
Mixed 227
SusWrite 170
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 31.5
103% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 61%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 356GB
0GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 20.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 28.5
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 74%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 644GB
85GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 201 207 212 212 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 57.2
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 202
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 1.2
315% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 116%
Great: 179%
WD Elements 25A1 1.5TB
658GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 66 70 75 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 85.8
Write 87.7
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 69.5
95% 71.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 47%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
23GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 22 23 19 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 79.5
Write 22.9
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 19.7
41% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 38%
4GB free, PID 1172
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 27.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 13.6
20% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 17
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H57M-USB3 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $101
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback