Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II Neo K325 Dual-Core 193 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	25% Poor	Memory 43.7 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 38.9 24% 34.2 Pts	4-Core 39 8-Core 38.6 5% 38.8 Pts	64-Core 39.1 2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 97 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0470) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.26% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.42 Parallax 0.03 0% 0.25 fps	MRender 0.71 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.38 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.26% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 62.3 Write 21.2 Mixed 23 26% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.12 29% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 43%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 197GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 18.2 Write 18.3 Mixed 18.3 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.34 76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unifosa GU6C2303EP02 2x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.67 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 17%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16