Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P6X58D-E (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101004
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 01 '20 at 03:50
Run Duration	224 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	95%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 119 58% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 287 32% 250 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 311.50 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.1 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 17.2 12% 15.5 fps	MRender 21.4 Gravity 19.7 Splatting 16.9 16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 25 19 27 19 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26% Poor	Read 148 Write 87.1 Mixed 134 SusWrite 28.9 22% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 26.4 4K Mixed 14.6 44% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 76 64% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 116%
ARRAY 500GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 433GB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.4 9.2 9.6 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 18 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 9.6 13% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 76%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 10GB free Firmware: 10.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 33 41 35 39 34 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 61.1 Write 39.4 Mixed 34.4 SusWrite 37.4 32% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 35%
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB 1,323 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 208GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 72 81 86 82 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 114 Write 106 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 80.8 65% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 64%
Maxtor 6H500F0 500GB 433 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 424GB free Firmware: HA43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 64 65 64 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 66.6 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 63 42% 57.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.1 147% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 37%
Array 200GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 107GB free Firmware: V1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 18 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.93% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 22.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 17.6 13% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.1 90% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.93% Great: 15%
WD WD2502ABYS-18B7A0 250GB 1,323 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 170GB free Firmware: 02.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 80 83 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 57.9 SusWrite 78.9 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 64%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100 3,663 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 390GB free Firmware: SN06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 58 65 69 66 66 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 107 Write 77.9 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 65.4 51% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	39.3% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 11 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	498x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	200x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	145x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	74x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	68x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	231x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	222x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	132x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $299

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16