Hp-pavilion WC855AA-ABE p6370es

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion WC855AA-ABE p6370es (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	2.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 75 2-Core 118 57% 91.3 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 306 32% 259 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250X 12,863 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 300B) 2GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 21.8 13% 18.3 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 18.8 14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 331GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 128 114 114 113 113 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.2% Above average	Read 202 Write 102 Mixed 207 SusWrite 131 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 23.6 85% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 60.4 78% 139 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 102%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$89 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 614GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 116 115 115 111 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 112 Write 128 Mixed 85.2 SusWrite 115 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 101GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 158 153 167 144 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 139 Write 116 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 147 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 114%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 478GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 25.6 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 2.9 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 72%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 102GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 23.8 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 21.5 32% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5273DH0-CH9 2C802C80 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 6GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion WC855AA-ABE p6370es

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)