MSI B150M PRO-VDH (MS-7982)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7982
MotherboardMSI B150M PRO-VDH (MS-7982)  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161226
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateAug 31 '20 at 17:13
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$84
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 379
43% 334 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 30
Parallax 36
31% 34.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 35.5
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 294 323 343 329 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 356
Write 340
Mixed 284
SusWrite 308
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 38.6
114% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 257
219% 321 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85%
Great: 129%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
94GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 329 369 394 394 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 391
Mixed 378
SusWrite 354
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 45.4
148% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 294
240% 341 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
110GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 168 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 378
Mixed 305
SusWrite 160
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 45.6
160% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 133
162% 285 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 110%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$40
71GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 101 105 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 116
Write 105
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 104
61% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 107%
Generic Storage Device 1GB
0GB free, PID 1336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.6
3% 2.88 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GX2133D464L15S/8G 075D GY2133D464L15S/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M PRO-VDH (MS-7982) Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B150M PRO-VDH (MS-7982)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $351
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback