Samsung R538/R578/R778

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung R538/R578/R778  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R538/R578/R778
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration846 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 53.7
2-Core 87.8
48% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 38.7
8-Core 138
9% 88.2 Pts
64-Core 37.3
2% 37.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Sanyo(144D C07F) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 137 52 48 50 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 216
Write 117
Mixed 207
SusWrite 87.4
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 25.1
77% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 183
136% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
53GB free
Firmware: PB4OC66G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 42 42 42 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 47
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 42.8
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 45%
Single Flash Reader 2GB
1GB free, PID 6335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.5 3.7 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.4
8% 6.53 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 7%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 5.2 5.2 4.1 3.1 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 4.1
5% 4.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 8.1
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R538/R578/R778 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R538/R578/R778

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback