Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2 400 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 192 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 621 62% 502 Pts	64-Core 981 61% 981 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820 7,330 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.09 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 26.5 Parallax 36.9 21% 29.6 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 25 Splatting 26.8 24% 30 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM84 256GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 57 62 57 59 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 364 Write 94.2 Mixed 119 SusWrite 60.7 35% 159 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 20.1 88% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 53.6 70% 131 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 73%
HP MB2000FBZPN 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPD1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 146 Write 37.5 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 41.9 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 76%
HP MB2000FBUCL 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2TB free Firmware: HPDA SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 43 43 43 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 145 Write 42.5 Mixed 53 SusWrite 42.7 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.4% Poor	MC Read 13 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.4 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16