PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 26GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 26GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 26 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110609 |
Uptime | 6.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 07 '20 at 22:11 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 192 206 211 195 208 MB/s
|
63.6%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
30GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 45 44 45 MB/s
|
25%
Poor
|
|||
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB
652GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 25 25 MB/s
|
14.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements SE 2623 2TB
1TB free, PID 2623
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 26 27 MB/s
|
18.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
38%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 135x |
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 93x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 57x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 25x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $283 |