Acer Aspire A315-21

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive2.87% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-21  (all builds)
MotherboardSR Squirtle_SR
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime78.5 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 16:59
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9120 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 92.4
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 19.9
37% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 25
8-Core 42.5
4% 33.8 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 1192) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 17.5
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 3.03
2% 3.47 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 3.04
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S600 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HC1106A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 0.5 46 0.4 29 36 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
2.87% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 81.1
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 28.6
10% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0
4% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 2.87%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3A1 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 1.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-21 Builds (Compare 338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback