PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3L (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20080402 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 06 '20 at 03:49 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 115 126 129 131 130 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722525VLAT80 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: V36OA6EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 55 56 55 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Multi Flash Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
6.18%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
20%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 15x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 12x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 11x |
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 6x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |