Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181209
Uptime	7.5 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 71.2 1-Core 102 2-Core 180 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 570 54% 447 Pts	64-Core 747 46% 747 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11C3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 37.9 34% 36.7 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 39.6 Splatting 36.6 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,387 Write 1,462 Mixed 1,247 374% 1,699 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 63.3 213% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 766 DQ Write 544 DQ Mixed 717 519% 676 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 213GB free Firmware: 7101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15% Very poor	Read 36 Write 36.5 Mixed 36 SusWrite 13.3 7% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 11.4 39% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 15.1 12% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 113%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 103GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 212 71 64 61 60 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Read 486 Write 464 Mixed 395 SusWrite 152 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 42.8 143% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 359 270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 121%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 759GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 99 109 100 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 72.5 Write 48.2 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 104 46% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 263GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 126 89 86 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 125 Write 127 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 106 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 29GB free Firmware: 7101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 30.8 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 13.1 20% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 101%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 68GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	9.51% Terrible	Read 32.2 Write 32.7 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 12.9 35% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.51% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR Corsair CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 F4-2400C15-8GVR 20GB 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.8% Good	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 21 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 21.3 SC Mixed 21.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 98.6 41% 98.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $540

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16