Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G6960 113 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 52.4 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 106 42% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 129 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 116 7% 116 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 153 151 147 148 143 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.3% Below average	Read 147 Write 128 Mixed 122 SusWrite 147 31% 136 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 12 40% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 100 90% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 100%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 92 92 92 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 90.1 Write 89.4 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 91.2 60% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 6 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	11x
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	6x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x
LCH-256V2S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonBench 79%, 1,558 samples	3x
PM851 2.5 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 58%, 3,901 samples	2x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $140

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16