Acer Aspire A315-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Metapod_KL
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 18:58
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 190
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 299
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 1295) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 6
5% 6.96 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12.6
6% 6.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 270 270 272 273 270 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 395
Mixed 389
SusWrite 270
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.5
182% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 239
212% 318 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
USB DISK 3.0 252GB
183GB free, PID 6400, kodak
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 42 36 7.5 34 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 245
Write 97.2
Mixed 114
SusWrite 38.2
141% 123 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 4.4
284% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-53 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback