Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2180-$130 7,312 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	12% Very poor	Memory 21.8 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 14.2 12% 17.2 Pts	4-Core 13.4 8-Core 15.3 2% 14.4 Pts	64-Core 13.1 1% 13.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.1 9.2 10 6.8 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.72% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 10 Mixed 11 SusWrite 7.1 8% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 42%
hp v245o 32GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 23GB free, PID ad07 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 7.1 6.2 7 7.2 6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 5.2 Mixed 12 SusWrite 7 12% 8.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 1GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	3.17% Terrible	MC Read 0.9 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 0.5 3% 0.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.2 GB/s	Latency 308 13% 308 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.17% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E4600IntelBench 34%, 6,872 samples	2x
Core2 6600Intel $90Bench 37%, 8,894 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x

SSD
KP330 120GBKingbankBench 63%, 173 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16