Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111013
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 15:34
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 64.4 2-Core 124 57% 91.1 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 325 32% 264 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6790 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 13.2 12% 13.8 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 15.2 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 527ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 54 50 53 58 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Read 249 Write 64.2 Mixed 87 SusWrite 54.8 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 27.8 95% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 70.4 DQ Mixed 32.3 29% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 205GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 123 114 123 108 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 113 Write 112 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 113 71% 97.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 81GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 123 114 124 108 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 148 Write 153 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 114 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 177 173 165 175 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 136 Write 104 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 172 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 90% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 189 Write 150 Mixed 24 87% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 30GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 29.5 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 0.1 28% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 72%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 14GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 29.7 Mixed 28 SusWrite 26.5 39% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 176GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 29.2 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 0 27% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 56%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 3GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.07% Terrible	Read 27 Write 28.5 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 3.4 28% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.07% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 15.6 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-D3 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-D3

CPU
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	10x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	8x

GPU
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples	4x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
GOODRAM 120GBBench 68%, 5,433 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	31x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	14x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $447

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16