Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7400  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RW199
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5472
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 86.4
41% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 339
30% 255 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4800
Nvidia(10DE 0594) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 8.73
Parallax 4.28
8% 7.48 fps
MRender 8.67
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 6.13
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 5/i 479GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 236 223 211 217 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 599GB
467GB free
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 69 67 55 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 199
Write 38.2
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 49.2
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1.8
402% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 131%
WDC WD20 EZRX-22D8PB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 24 23 24 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 21.7
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 23.1
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5.2
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7400 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback