| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Latitude E6420 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 0K0DNP |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110711 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 20:28 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 50% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
23.5%
Poor
|
19% 25.5 Pts
|
4% 32.8 Pts
|
2% 36.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0493) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3517
|
0.94%
Terrible
|
0% 1.81 fps
|
3% 3.08 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 74 76 70 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
41% 56.4 MB/s
|
108% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
|
17.4%
Very poor
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
9% 3.07 GB/s
|
21% 194 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Latitude E6420 Builds (Compare 2,166 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Latitude E6420
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 1,062x |
| Core i5-2540MIntel $315Bench 52%, 16,964 samples | 306x |
| Core i7-2640MIntelBench 54%, 12,152 samples | 194x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 1,632x |
| NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples | 356x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 158x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $62 |