Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel U7300 1,665 User benchmarks, average bench 30% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 30.8 27% 36 Pts	4-Core 32.7 8-Core 32.4 4% 32.6 Pts	64-Core 31.7 2% 31.7 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 906F) 829MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.35% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.4 fps	MRender 0.33 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 0.48 0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.35% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX930 240GB-$80 1,536 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6.8SE SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 93 141 162 181 157 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 210 Write 194 Mixed 180 SusWrite 150 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 21.5 71% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 86.9 DQ Write 81.6 DQ Mixed 82.4 62% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125S6BFR8C-G7 1x2GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.88% Terrible	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 2.6 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.6 2% 0.83 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.88% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16