Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 16:24
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 182
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 329
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 34.3
20% 28.7 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 27.1
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 311 336 294 300 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 411
Write 364
Mixed 226
SusWrite 306
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 16.8
63% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 339
243% 308 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 45 67 66 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 78.1
Write 74.1
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 62.4
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
41% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 64GB-$48
17GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 26 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 23.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 25.5
34% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
78% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback