Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-A-110 (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD PT10AN
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '20 at 16:38
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 41.8 26% 37.3 Pts	4-Core 70.7 8-Core 76.6 10% 73.6 Pts	64-Core 76 5% 76 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA34) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 2.31 1% 2.43 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 2.78 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 19 86 46 15 67 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.2% Poor	Read 176 Write 87 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 56.5 22% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 14.1 4K Mixed 8.3 33% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 16.4 DQ Write 17.3 DQ Mixed 14.8 12% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16