Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 162%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 02:05
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 159
2-Core 284
100% 180 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 992
100% 809 Pts
64-Core 1,281
79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 107%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
153% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 220
Parallax 216
172% 215 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 200
Splatting 132
153% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 153%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,598
Write 2,294
Mixed 1,613
481% 2,168 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 94.5
323% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,013
DQ Write 1,378
DQ Mixed 1,170
891% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
238GB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 282 283 283 283 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2410
Write 1,128
Mixed 1,100
SusWrite 316
272% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 71.2
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 104
361% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 807
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 635
551% 809 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 267%
Great: 157%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
187GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 489 487 489 487 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 489
Mixed 411
SusWrite 488
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 66.9
227% 81.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 137%
Great: 134%
Hectron HECX1-500G 500GB
104GB free
Firmware: H1AB02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 402 398 402 405 407 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 402
Mixed 314
SusWrite 403
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 48.2
172% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 195
162% 234 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$94
350GB free
Firmware: KA05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 108 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 107
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
363GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 97 105 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 54
SusWrite 99.6
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 30.2
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 31.1
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 51.5
78% 51.5 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,246
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback