Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 18:12
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 152
58% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 423
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 86.8
55% 72.2 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 78.1
56% 66.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 229 226 240 233 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 444
Mixed 379
SusWrite 241
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 46.9
158% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 140
119% 174 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92%
Great: 118%
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
208GB free
Firmware: JULA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 417 421 351 175 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 478
Write 415
Mixed 416
SusWrite 321
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 37.7
119% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 128
115% 177 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
617GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 91 93 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.2
Write 106
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 91
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-439.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback