Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 77% 131 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 489 54% 428 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 3102) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 20.4 18% 20 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 23 Splatting 17.4 18% 22 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 211 242 231 209 205 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 467 Write 440 Mixed 367 SusWrite 231 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 38.9 125% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 222 207% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 118%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 448GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 132 Mixed 80.8 81% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 234GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 44 44 44 45 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	25% Poor	Read 42.8 Write 42.5 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 43.7 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 41%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.3 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.4 7% 6.65 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 7%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 288GB free, PID 0b1a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 80 81 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 79.4 Write 76.7 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 80.2 86% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 43%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 250GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 127GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 154 159 160 159 159 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 220 Write 197 Mixed 218 SusWrite 149 263% 196 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 21.8 1,585% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.8 DQ Write 30.8 DQ Mixed 23.9 1,938% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 139%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.3% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 62.2 64% 62.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	156x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $219

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16