Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 17:24
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 247
92% 162 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 779
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 47.6
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.5
39% 48.9 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 47.5
Splatting 61.8
48% 59 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 498 490 485 487 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,596
Write 2,289
Mixed 1,380
SusWrite 545
379% 1,703 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 95.8
320% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,525
DQ Write 1185
DQ Mixed 1,306
990% 1,339 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 297%
Great: 340%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
46GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 162 74 64 58 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 479
Mixed 327
SusWrite 120
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 52.4
187% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 249
212% 313 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
616GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 478 478 482 479 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 457
Mixed 386
SusWrite 479
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 56.1
198% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 241
210% 312 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 123%
Great: 117%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
179GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 76 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 26.2
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 79.1
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD105SI 1TB
796GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 45 44 44 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 41.1
Write 44.6
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 44.6
55% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
121% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 32.8
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 33.1
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $725
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback