Medionpc MS-7713

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medionpc MS-7713 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDIONPC MS-7713
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101231
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '20 at 12:25
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70 18,839 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 73.4 1-Core 44.4 2-Core 88 44% 68.6 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 178 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Zotac(19DA 4178) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Lighting 6.87 Reflection 7.88 Parallax 5.62 6% 6.79 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 7.47 Splatting 8.13 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 22,748 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 87 91 94 92 93 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.5% Average	Read 241 Write 224 Mixed 213 SusWrite 106 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 21.5 77% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 117 95% 135 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 94%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 590GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 90 90 90 89 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Read 91.1 Write 91.5 Mixed 45.2 SusWrite 89.1 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 64%
USB DISK 3.0 127GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 18GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 23 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 24.6 Write 20.6 Mixed 3 SusWrite 21.3 22% 17.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 70% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ST102464BA1339.16F Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 667, 200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 93.8 43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7713 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7713

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	1x
Athlon II X3 445AMD $100Bench 44%, 3,101 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	2x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 32%, 166 samples	5x
CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 48%, 298 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $105

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16