Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 157 57% 101 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 230 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.5% Below average	Lighting 25 Reflection 32.3 Parallax 85.2 20% 47.5 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 57.7 53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 832 837 837 847 845 843 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 1,961 Write 1,764 Mixed 1,057 SusWrite 840 314% 1,405 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 37 141% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 498 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 408 303% 405 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 355%
Intenso Slim Line 32GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.53% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 22.8 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 14.3 27% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 4% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.53% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	31% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $90

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,921x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,683x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	606x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	721x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	499x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	473x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	230x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	213x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	592x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	492x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	356x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $443

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16