Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 08:08
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 206
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 464
62% 464 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 39.6
37% 43.1 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 8.1 4.8 61 234 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 432
Write 354
Mixed 9
SusWrite 92.7
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 20.1
76% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 45.4
49% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
43GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 152 116 93 83 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 490
Write 434
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 124
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 31
145% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 131
123% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50
210GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 192 191 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 491
Mixed 349
SusWrite 206
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 53.8
194% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 281
230% 330 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-60A7B2 500GB
266GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 36.8
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 42%
ST332082 0AS 320GB
106GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 18
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 4.9
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 28%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 41
Write 41.7
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 0.4
39% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
430GB free, PID a108
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 5.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 5.3
14% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback