Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '19 at 05:16
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,085
101% 844 Pts
64-Core 1,470
91% 1,470 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 132
Parallax 112
98% 121 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 118
Splatting 101
85% 104 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$154
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2396 2114 1180 1164 1167 1171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 2409
Mixed 1,751
SusWrite 1532
455% 2,024 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 85.3
281% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,305
DQ Write 1,162
DQ Mixed 1,223
920% 1,230 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 332%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
82GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 450 159 121 126 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 443
Mixed 394
SusWrite 234
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 56.4
185% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 202
Write 163
Mixed 95
113% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.2
207% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB
28GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Read 23
Write 15.3
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 4.6
18% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2.4
129% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 17%
Sony Storage Media 2GB
0GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.2
7% 7.17 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB
91GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 38.2
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 39.4
49% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 27.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $935
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback