Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 57.3 2-Core 96.6 45% 72.5 Pts	4-Core 99.7 8-Core 97.9 13% 98.8 Pts	64-Core 96.1 6% 96.1 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 0620) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 217 216 195 186 184 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 410 Write 226 Mixed 243 SusWrite 202 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 14 81% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 23.1 42% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B88B0NF-DI 2x4GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.67 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
HU564404EP0200 2x4GBUnifosaBench 49%, 333 samples	1x
ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 45%, 142 samples	1x
ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 152 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $163

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16