PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0RW199 |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120430 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 31 '19 at 21:45 |
Run Duration | 341 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5472
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.1
|
21.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 91 43 52 43 9.2 MB/s
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
174GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 76 77 77 77 MB/s
|
40%
Below average
|
|||
1 500GB
144GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
115GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 106 105 107 MB/s
|
55.7%
Above average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
90GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
38GB free
Firmware: 3B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 69 68 MB/s
|
40.5%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
87GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 88 88 88 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B0 1TB
454GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB
260GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.5 8.5 8.5 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
|||
6.15%
Terrible
|
||||
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00V1A0 500GB
63GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.5 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
11.2%
Very poor
|
||||
Hitachi HTS54757 750GB
69GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 MB/s
|
9.58%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |