Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 11:30
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 106
52% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 284
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.8% Average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 66.3
39% 60.7 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 55.4
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 410 419 420 418 423 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 411
Mixed 405
SusWrite 412
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 38.2
123% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 183
140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
90GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 194 147 134 144 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 375
Write 225
Mixed 302
SusWrite 173
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 30.2
105% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 111
96% 143 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
7GB free
Firmware: JP2OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 92 105 98 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 96.4
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 74%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
52GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 82 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 66.9
Write 65.1
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 79.4
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 51%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
243GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 45 48 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 50.9
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 45.1
54% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DBLT8GN128O 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $195
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback