Asus P8H61 EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61 EVO (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110407
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '19 at 22:46
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G840-$45 2,557 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 82.3 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 115 57% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 144 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 838A) 1GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.18% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 4.34 4% 5.16 fps	MRender 7.43 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 3.61 4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.18% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 222 Write 206 Mixed 178 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 37.4 124% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 46.8 40% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 28GB free Firmware: ML6OAA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 79 81 84 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 76.5 Write 82.8 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 83.7 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 73%
ACTIONS HS USB FlashDisk 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.3 6.9 6.4 8.2 7.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.62% Terrible	Read 11.3 Write 8 Mixed 9 SusWrite 6.9 12% 8.8 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 72% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.62% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773QB0-CK0 6GB 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.5% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61 EVO Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 EVO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	5x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	4x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	2x

SSD
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	2x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	2x
99U5474-023.A00LF 9905474-040.A00LF 99U5474-023.A00LF 9905474-040.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 39%, 2 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16