Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 06 '19 at 14:08
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 221
60% 114 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 500
44% 374 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 55 55 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 143
Write 92.5
Mixed 109
SusWrite 75
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 11.7
52% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 115
97% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HTE725032A9A364 320GB
85GB free
Firmware: PC3OC70E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 6.9 5 5.1 5 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.67% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 19.5
Mixed 8.6
SusWrite 7.5
10% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.67%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
668GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 165 165 165 165 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 130
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 164
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.3% Very good
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 30.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M S2H Builds (Compare 6,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback