Supermicro C7X99-OCE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSupermicro C7X99-OCE  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro C7X99-OCE
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160623
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 28 '19 at 17:54
Run Duration724 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 758
71% 588 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Asus(1043 844D) 1GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 21.3
14% 18.3 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15
15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 364 200 197 195 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 449
Mixed 377
SusWrite 159
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 52.7
178% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 347
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 124%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
150GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 367 289 161 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 412
Write 389
Mixed 343
SusWrite 164
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 34.2
126% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 188
178% 277 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 100%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 4TB
891GB free
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
Read 100
Write 39
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 13.3
32% 44.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 43 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.8% Below average
Read 124
Write 43.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 14.5
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.83 MB/s
LSI 9650SE-16ML 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
Read 217
Write 3.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 1.2
41% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 121%
LSI 9650SE-16ML 2TB
369GB free
Firmware: 4.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 3.2 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 71
SusWrite 33.2
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2
340% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 46%
DaneElec Z Mate 32GB
2GB free, PID 0000, DaneElec 32GB
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 13 15 15 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 15.3
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 9.9
18% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 11%
Inateck 960GB
132GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 315 316 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
220% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 321
Mixed 196
SusWrite 105
281% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 27.6
2,844% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 31.6
3,898% 45 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 220%
Great: 220%
Inateck 960GB
124GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 285 282 182 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
219% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 277
Mixed 179
SusWrite 148
269% 191 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 25.6
2,705% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 30.2
3,873% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 34.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 100%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C7X99-OCE Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro C7X99-OCE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $312
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback