| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K-VM (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080620 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 28 '19 at 11:01 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | PAK-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
48.9%
Average
|
43% 66.7 Pts
|
22% 162 Pts
|
10% 161 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.1%
Poor
|
20% 25.7 fps
|
26% 31.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 85 91 75 80 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
26% 117 MB/s
|
72% 25 MB/s
|
24% 39.7 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
108GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 75 75 74 74 MB/s
|
43.3%
Average
|
51% 69.7 MB/s
|
187% 1.37 MB/s
| |
|
I-O DATA HDPS-U 320GB
133GB free, PID 0122
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
9.98%
Terrible
|
30% 21.6 MB/s
|
22% 0.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.6%
Poor
|
19% 6.57 GB/s
|
17% 6 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K-VM Builds (Compare 56 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K-VM
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 5x |
| GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 4x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |