Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '19 at 13:18
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 75.2
1-Core 61.5
2-Core 116
52% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 283
31% 246 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 043B) 2GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 17
Parallax 16.1
10% 15.1 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 19
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
54GB free
Firmware: 521A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 18 17 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60% Good
Read 380
Write 207
Mixed 228
SusWrite 16.9
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 36.1
111% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 172
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60%
Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
973GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 15 15 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 167
Write 139
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 21.9
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD300LJ 300GB-$25
39GB free
Firmware: ZT10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 18 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 56.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 16.8
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20%
Great: 34%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
169GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 18 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 94.8
Write 99
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 16.9
50% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 60%
Maxtor 6 V300F0 300GB
15GB free
Firmware: VA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 18 17 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 50.3
Write 57
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 16.8
30% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5402-057.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5402-057.A00LF 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback