Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5530 662 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 68.5 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 89.8 44% 69 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 209 22% 173 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% AMD(1002 0000) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 8.03 5% 6.61 fps	MRender 7.1 Gravity 8.03 Splatting 11.3 8% 8.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-E100I/128G 128GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: T170428a Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 197 Write 181 Mixed 159 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 6.8 33% 9.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 80%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 25GB free Firmware: JPFOA3BG SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 71 65 70 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 44.8 Write 46.3 Mixed 26 SusWrite 69.9 34% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MXIC 25L3205 1x36GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 7 slots used 36GB FLASH 33 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 0.7 8% 2.67 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x

RAM
HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 40GBHynixBench 38%, 11 samples	2x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	2x
HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 Winbond W25X/Q32 44GBHynixBench 38%, 13 samples	2x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $147