Toshiba SATELLITE L850-13P

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850-13P (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120329
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '16 at 18:47
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 88.4 1-Core 73 2-Core 142 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 194 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 195 12% 195 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.0.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.22% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.62 Parallax 5.31 5% 6.14 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 7.17 5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.22% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 5 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (64) Unknown 100 100 23632 (65) Unknown 100 100 25136 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 14 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 658 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 34 100 150325362722 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 5 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 40 (EA) Unknown 100 100 25 (F1) Unknown 100 100 37 (F2) Unknown 100 100 23 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 5	50.3% Above average	Read 460 Write 168 Mixed 162 57% 263 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 22.4 4K Mixed 7.2 50% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 17.5 52% 115 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 82%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66 9,402 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 289GB free Firmware: GT001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2147 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2512 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 6869 (0A) Spinup retry count 149 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2492 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 220 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 58 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 27400 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044053021 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 8256 (DE) Loaded hours 88 88 5028 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 293 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	39.7% Below average	Read 68.1 Write 70.1 Mixed 8.85 35% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.23 69% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.1 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba SATELLITE L850-13P

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)