Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '19 at 23:04
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 990
88% 743 Pts
64-Core 1,357
84% 1,357 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2094 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 119
Parallax 97.4
84% 106 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 100
Splatting 107
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 352 309 309 309 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,938
Write 1,368
Mixed 626
SusWrite 476
244% 1,102 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 50.8
192% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 627
538% 793 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 204%
Great: 236%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB
256GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 373 164 187 71 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 276
Write 103
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 207
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 11
43% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 85.6
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 92.9
104% 167 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA THNS512G 512GB
86GB free
Firmware: AGYA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 179 178 174 183 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 158
Write 144
Mixed 140
SusWrite 178
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 10.7
52% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 6.7
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 10.1
12% 20 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 34%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 240GB
94GB free
Firmware: 60AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 186 185 174 182 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 411
Write 274
Mixed 304
SusWrite 180
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 27.2
95% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 100
97% 147 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EADS-00M 1TB
94GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 26 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 38.8
Write 27.5
Mixed 27
SusWrite 26.1
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2C3000C15 Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX CMK16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2746, 2746, 2746, 2746 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 31.7
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 97%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback