HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory	42.2 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	153.4 Days
Run Date	May 22 '19 at 21:19
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670 4,676 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 114 53% 82.9 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 446 40% 337 Pts	64-Core 850 53% 850 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5200 1,717 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Nvidia(10DE 1095) ≥ 4GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 7.5GB, Driver: 411.81 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.4% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 40.7 Parallax 49.7 33% 43.5 fps	MRender 49.1 Gravity 43 Splatting 29.4 32% 40.5 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 237GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 104 87 136 99 125 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.1% Above average	Read 253 Write 43.5 Mixed 140 SusWrite 104 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 34.8 113% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 127 104% 151 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 124%
Kingston HyperX 120GB 3,401 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 103GB free Firmware: 320A SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 242 266 250 261 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	43% Average	Read 457 Write 5.8 Mixed 9 SusWrite 237 38% 177 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 257GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 164 109 154 110 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 16.3 Write 109 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 134 64% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB 22,636 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 815GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 50 61 50 63 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 30.8 Write 75 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 57 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 82GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 25.3 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 60.1 66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	253x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	144x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	130x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	99x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	52x
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples	36x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16