MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateMay 12 '19 at 10:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 791
75% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 86.2
57% 72.3 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 59
Splatting 78.3
56% 66.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 53 54 78 50 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 427
Write 379
Mixed 173
SusWrite 68.1
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 21.6
119% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 19.6
61% 130 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
184GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 147 148 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 151
Write 126
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 146
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
635GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 41
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 41.4
53% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 13.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 10
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $797
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback