Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 02 '16 at 15:44
Run Duration354 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 160
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 635
56% 478 Pts
64-Core 1,580
98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 45.1
3% 28 fps
MRender 48.1
Gravity 45
Splatting 35.2
34% 42.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.3% Good
Read 266
Write 204
Mixed 213
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 35
117% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 98
93% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
93GB free
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63% Good
Read 490
Write 142
Mixed 189
59% 274 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 13.1
98% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 39.3
60% 113 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63%
Great: 82%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 106
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.15
4K Mixed 0.2
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 105%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48% Average
Read 113
Write 119
Mixed 74.1
128% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.27
74% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48%
Great: 62%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68AX9N0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.4% Above average
Read 130
Write 127
Mixed 76.3
138% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.19
93% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 33.4
106% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.96
4K Mixed 0.25
77% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
616GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Read 117
Write 132
Mixed 57.9
128% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.23
78% 0.94 MB/s
WDC WD50 EFRX-68MYMN1 5TB
481GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 104
Write 121
Mixed 118
151% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 2.69
4K Mixed 0.26
102% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 51%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
463GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 69.5
125% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 0.31
405% 4.11 MB/s
DQ Read 0.81
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 0.62
414% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%
WDC WD50 EFRX-68MYMN1 5TB
278GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 78.2
126% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.16
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.92 MB/s
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
233GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 136
Write 122
Mixed 107
153% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.25
82% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ-1G 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $363
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback